Status Quotidian

Re-engaging the quotidian needs and utopian aspirations of modernism’s origins.

What is modern? In his essay for n+1 on the legacy of I.M. Pei, Thomas de Monchaux sets up Pei as the quintessential modernist, “among the last practicing students of a teacher from the Bauhaus.” Splitting Pei’s work into his developer towers and commercial projects (Early Pei), and his cultural commissions, like the Louvre pyramid (Late Pei), de Monchaux argues Early Pei‘s buildings, not Late Pei’s “photogenic work,” are the modernism that “will eventually matter most.” He calls the work “vernacular modernism.” Borrowing from another of de Monchaux’s articles, these are buildings that know “where and when they’re situated.” Pei’s early buildings anticipate the needs of their inhabitants. They are quiet and “anonymous” buildings that look simple at a distance but reveal themselves through close observation.

These are fighting words, not just against postmoderist excess, at which de Monchaux still takes a shot, but against modernists themselves. Back in the ’70s, modernism was on the defensive, associated with bleak towers and dilapidated public works. The architects …

Hannah Hoyt likes architecture.

Read 3 free articles by joining our newsletter.

Or login if you are a subscriber.

or
from $5/month