Abstract Thinking

In his latest treatise, Pier Vittorio Aureli frames architectural production as a stand-in for the much larger and more complex system of economic production as a whole. The problems start there.

In architecture discourse as in pretty much all Western academia, you never want to go “full Marxist”—not if you don’t want to be shunned from polite company. A full Marxist simply can’t be trusted to follow the disciplinary kayfabe. Under their withering materialist gaze, the disinterestedness and ethical autonomy that academic professions avow reveal very much interested ulterior motives. The full Marxist doesn’t respect the rules of the game and so must be treated as a potentially serious liability.

At the same time, if you’re not at least a little bit of a Marxist, it’s hard to position yourself as someone who takes the social stakes of architecture seriously. Without some Marx, how do you go about establishing your political bona fides? Sure, there are other angles, but everyone knows it’s about capitalism at the end of the day, and Marx remains by far the most effective critic. Therefore, the trick is to find ways to position yourself both inside and outside…

Will Orr is a (can you tell?) Marxist researcher, writer, and teacher patrolling the architecture beat in London academia. He is cohost, with Ricardo Ruivo, of the Streetsweeper podcast.

Read 3 free articles by joining our newsletter.

Or login if you are a subscriber.

or
from $5/month